Head-to-head

Float vs Planiflow for teams that also juggle meetings

Float schedules who works on what. Planiflow shows the hours left after meetings, so you know before you say yes.

Start free trial → See the quick verdict

See the methodology and sources

Float is a clean, respected resource scheduler, and for studios that resource work across many projects it earns its place. The reason teams start shopping for an alternative is narrower than it sounds. Float syncs Google Calendar and Outlook, but a synced meeting lands as a fixed block beside the allocation, not as time taken out of the day.

So a person can read as free while the standup and a client call have already spent the morning. Planiflow reads the same calendar and counts those meetings against the hours, so what shows as available is what survives the week.

Tools compared

Float vs Planiflow

Quick verdict

Choose Planiflow

When the meetings in everyone's calendar have to count toward capacity before the team says yes to more work.

Stay with Float

When dedicated resource scheduling across many projects is the whole job and meeting time genuinely lives elsewhere.

Which tool should you choose?

Recommended answer for your situation

Your situationBetter fit
Is dedicated resource scheduling across many projects the core job?Float
Must calendar meetings count toward real capacity?Planiflow
Do tasks, meetings, and available hours need one weekly view?Planiflow
Does an ops or PMO role manage resourcing full time?Float

Tool by tool

Float

Float does resource scheduling well, and its reputation is deserved. The interface is quick, the allocation view reads at a glance, assigning people across projects takes seconds, and time off is native to the schedule, with utilization and over-capacity warnings built in. For an ops or PMO role resourcing dozens of concurrent projects, that depth is genuinely hard to beat.

The catch is meeting time. Float syncs Google Calendar and Outlook, so meetings are not invisible to it. But a synced event arrives as a fixed block pinned beside the allocation, not as hours pulled out of the day: the allocation math is built around scheduled work and time off. A week half spent in calls can still show generous free hours.

There is a workflow cost too. Float wants the plan to live in Float, while the day-to-day tasks usually live somewhere else. That makes it a second planning layer to maintain, which a dedicated resourcing manager absorbs easily and a small agency team often does not.

Planiflow

Planiflow is lighter than Float on purpose. It puts tasks, synced calendar meetings, and available hours on one weekly view, built for the team deciding whether it can say yes to the next project rather than for a full-time resourcing role. There is no sync with Float: a CSV export can be imported, with the columns matched by hand, then your tasks live in Planiflow and only the calendar keeps syncing.

The difference is what happens to the meetings. Once a Google Calendar or Outlook account is connected, Planiflow subtracts those meeting hours from each person's capacity, so the free time it reports is the time that survived the calls. That is the number a producer wanted before promising the retainer, not the one reconstructed on Friday.

Green, orange, and red bars show each person's load at a glance, and a red badge flags the days that tip over. To be fair the other way: if your resourcing genuinely spans dozens of concurrent projects with a dedicated manager, Float's depth may still win, and that is a reasonable reason to stay.

What capacity looks like in Planiflow

Planiflow brings tasks, meetings, and available hours together, so the hours shown as free per person are what is left once the day's real commitments are subtracted.

Planiflow capacity view: each person's load day by day, with the overloaded day flagged in red

Planiflow capacity view (real product screenshot): each person's load day by day, with the overloaded day flagged in red.

Bottom line

Float stays the right tool when dedicated resource scheduling is the job and the meetings live somewhere you do not need counted. The reason to move toward Planiflow is narrow and specific: the free hours on the plan keep turning out to be booked with meetings, and you want a schedule that already knows that before you promise the work. Some teams run both, resourcing in Float and checking the calendar-aware read in Planiflow.

Plan around the real day

Tasks and meetings in one schedule, so free hours are actually free.

Start free trial →

Common questions

Does Planiflow replace Float for resource scheduling?
For teams managing several projects at once, often yes, because it schedules the work and counts the meetings in one place. For large studios resourcing dozens of concurrent projects with a dedicated ops role, Float's depth may still fit better.
Why does counting meetings matter?
A schedule that pins meetings as fixed blocks beside the allocation, instead of subtracting them from availability, reports free time that is already spoken for. Once standups and client calls count against capacity, the real headroom is usually smaller than the plan suggests.
Can I use both Float and Planiflow?
Yes. Some teams resource in Float and use Planiflow to check capacity against the calendar before committing. There is no sync with Float: a CSV export can be imported once, with the columns matched by hand, and after that the calendar is what syncs.

Methodology and sources

Pricing and feature behaviour verified on Float's official pages. Plans change: confirm on Float's pages before buying. No competitor product screenshots are used on this page.

Start free trial →